Blog

Product Liability Lawyers

When someone buys a product, whether it’s a car, a pacemaker or a cut of meat, it’s expected to be safe and to be precisely what is advertised on the label. When something goes wrong and someone gets hurt, that’s when the issue of product liability comes into play. For those who want to press suit, product liability lawyers are the individuals they need on their side.

What Product Liability Lawyers Do

A product liability lawyer helps those who have been harmed in some way by a defective product. When this sort of incident happens the typical response is to press suit against the manufacturer, and to receive appropriate compensation for the injuries and suffering that the product’s failure caused. Every case is unique though, and that requires a product liability lawyer to be as sharp as possible in order to get the proper compensation for his or her clients.

How Product Liability Lawyers Work

The first goal in any product liability case is to prove that the product was faulty, and that it failed during a use where it shouldn’t have. For instance, if a car’s brakes were faulty and they gave out on the highway resulting in a traffic accident, then that is a perfectly legitimate case that could probably be settled out of court if one wanted to. Other cases are murkier, and harder to interpret. If someone is not using a product for what it was designed for, or if someone attempted to modify a product and it failed, then there can be some argument as to whether or not the failure is on the part of the company, or if it’s the responsibility of the person injured.

That’s essentially what the product liability lawyer’s job is; present the facts in such a way that his or her client is not at fault and is deserving of compensation. Of course the personal injury lawyers representing the manufacturer will attempt to show that the product failure is not their responsibility, and that it was caused by other factors for which they are not responsible. Out of this competitive arguing the goal is, of course, to come to as close to a true understanding of what happened as possible for the jury to decide who is at fault.